Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Uploading of TAX AUDIT REPORT FOR AY 2013-2014

Dear Sir,

Please let me know whether the TAX AUDIT REPORT U/S 44AB for AY 2013-2014 is to be filled
manually or uploaded online on the Income Tax E filing site.

Regards

Radhe Shyam Agarwal
Advocate
2nd Upper Floor, Opp. D.G.M.S
Zila Parishad, Hirapur
Dhanbad, Jharkhand 826001
Mob: 9431187698

Comment:1

CBDT has vide Notification No.NOTIFICATION NO. 34/2013, DATED 1-5-2013 provided that where
an assessee is required to furnish a report of audit under sections 44AB, 92E or 115JB of the Act, he
shall furnish the same electronically. Online filing of following audit reports shall be mandatory in
following cases:
(a) Tax Audit report under Sec. 44AB in respect of books of account;
(b) Audit report under Sec. 92E in respect of international transaction; or
(c) Audit report under Sec. 115JB in respect of MAT computation.

Thanks
Ravi Dakliya

Comment:2

This is likely to get changed and no notifications received till date. The process would be as follows
a)      Assesse in their Login Adds their Auditor as his ‘CA’ in their login
b)      Auditors would have to register themselves as CA
c)      There are utilities given to Generate XML for 3CA/3CB & 3CD
d)      Auditors in their login have to upload the Tax Audit report to ITD along with their DSC by way of an XML
Trust this process is clear.
Regards
Venugopal.G

Comment:3

Dear Sir
 
This means the uploading is to be done by Assessee and not by Chartered Accountant.

CA ATUL MEHTAA.P.MEHTA & ASSOCIATES39, Chakraberia Road (South)Kolkata - 700 025Mobile : 9830027784Office  : +91+33+24741584 
Query:Issue of cheque in sufficient to fund

Dear all,
One of my client, a private limited company, has issued a cheque dated
28/01/2013 for purchase of a property. But till date(i.e.9th April) the
party has not issued the cheque.
On the date of issue the cheque, the client is having sufficient fund but
towards the year end, the fund used for separate purpose & on 31st march,
2013, bank balance shows negative figure(taking into consideration the
pending cheque amount).
The agreement has been prepared & the cheque amount mentioned there.
The question is whether the client can show negative bank balance as on
31/03/2013 ?
What recourse can be taken in this case ?

Thanks & regards,
CA Umes Kejriwal
9836431715/9051016948
Reply1
There is no problem in showing the negative balance in bank Account. If you
are so wary of the situation append a note explaining the same and the
reason for difference with the actual balance as per bank statement.

PIYUSH CHIRANIA
PIYUSH CHIRANIA & ASSOCIATES 
Reply2
Bank balance can never be negative unless there is OD sanction by the bank.
Further, Notes cannot substitute Accounts.
JNGupta
9331022920
Reply3
Bank balance can be negetive even without a sanctioned limit. The credit
balance should be shown on teh current liabilities as Book OD. There is
absolutely no problem with that.

DP Ghatak, Durgapur
9434474982 

Reply4
I am of the opinion that it would be a 'Current Liability' and not a
negative balance in the 'cash and bank balances'. However it is clearly
unsecured, the creditors have moved from one group to another.
Venu &Vinay


Reply5
Bank Balance as per Client's Bank Book can be negative without a sanctioned   limit and may be subject to
BRS. This is simply a Book Overdraft and there is no problem with it. This is based on practical situation .

CA. A.K.De
 

Doubt in House Property

I have a house, which is in a city other than my place of posting and is
rented out at Rs 5000 p.m. . The housing loan is Rs 25 Lacs in my name and
EMI is Rs 25000 p.m.

How do i claim income tax benefit under the head 'Loss on Income from House
Property'
ca.amitsinghi@gmail.com

ACES ACCEPTS REJECTED ST 3 RETURNS_SKKA_IDT ALERT_08/2013 DATED 08/05/2013

Dear All,
We are pleased to share with you the following tax alert:
CBEC has accepted the Service Tax returns for the period July-September,
2012, which were rejected by system on the sole ground that these returns
were filed for the period prior to the dates of registration of the
assessees, as valid returns. These returns have been reprocessed in ACES and
the status of these returns is being shown in the systems as 'filed'. These
assessees, need not file the returns again for the same period and they can
view the status of their returns in ACES under 'View XML Status' option.
However, if the returns were rejected for any other reason, the assessees
are required to take corrective action as per the reasons of rejection.

This is as per the information portrayed in the aces website
(www.aces.gov.in).

We hope you find this alert, both timely and useful.
Thanks & Regards,
CA Ankit Kanodia|Partner - Tax & Regulatory

S.K.Kanodia & Associates|Chartered Accountants

39A, Jorapukur Square Lane, Room # 202,

Kolkata- 700006, WB, INDIA.

T | 098315 43580

E | ankit@skkassociates.com

W| www.skkassociates.com





Query:CENVAT Credit on Generator Set

Query:CENVAT Credit on Generator Set 



Can CENVAT credit be enjoyed on duty paid on purchase of generator set for
use in Cinema Hall for movie exhibition.

--
*Priyanka Lath.*

Query: Tax Liability of salaried employee.

Query: Tax Liability of salaried employee.

Dear Professional Colleague,

 One of my client is an employee of Consulate General of Japan based in
 kolkata and is drawing a hefty package.

 The employer is neither deducting TDS from the salary nor is issuing Form
 16 nor is he issuing any monthly payslip. He is just issuing a certificate
 at the year end mentioning the total amount paid during the FY and the
 amount contributed towards PF. The monthly salary is credited to the Bank
 A/c of d employee.

 Now we need to file the IT return for the FY 13-14 wherein he is not in
 a position to claim deduction/exemption as there is no breakup of Salary
 Structure.

 Plz advice as to how we sud do the tax computation and whether we can
 formulate our own salary structure and claim deduction of Allowances accordingly.
 Thanks & Regards,
P K Agarwal.
Reply:1
Dear Mr P K Agarwal,
With regard to your below mentioned Query, I would like to advise you that,
rather than formulating your own Salary Structure, kindly look into his
terms of appointment. There would certainly be an appointment letter be
issued by the Organisation wherein the structure would have been mentioned.
If further evidence from the same could not be arrived at, than you can
also look into other evidence as in what other employees are doing for the
purpose of filing their returns.
Regards
Dipendar Daga

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Q & A :CARO

Q & A :CARO 
Hi,

Someone may please reply to the following query(s):

ABC Private Limited had:

- paid up capital Rs.1 Lac and
- Reserves and Surplus (negative balance) Rs.2 Crores as on 31.03.12.
- turnover Rs.1.95 Crores.
- no secured loans from banks or any parties.

Query

Whether CARO shall apply to the said company?

Ans : .......................

Thanks. 

On Behalf Of DK

REPLY:1
Dear DK,

Please go thru, the provisions of Clause 2(iv) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 issued by the erstwhile Department of Company Affairs, in exercise of its power conferred by Section 227 (4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, this order applies to every company except:-

(iv) a private limited company with a paid-up capital and reserves nor more than rupees fifty lakhs and which does not have loan outstanding exceeding rupees twenty five lakhs from any bank or financial institution and does not have a turn over exceeding rupees five crores at any point of time during the financial year.

Since the ABC Private Limited (it is assumed that it is not a subsidiary of any public company) satisfies all the above conditions, "CARO-2003" is not applicable. However, if ABC Private Limited is a subsidiary of any public company, the "CARO-2003" will be applicable since as per the definitions stated in Section 3(iv) of the Companies Act, 1956, "public company" means which is a not a private company and is a private company which is a subsidiary of a company which is not a private company.

Wit warm regards,

CS. K. Krishnamoorthy 

REPLY:2
No CARO is not applicable. 
--
*Thanks $ Regards**.........................**?*
*CS KANIKA PHOPHALIA*
*ॐ भूर्भुवः स्वः तत्सवितुर्वरेण्यं भर्गो देवस्य धीमहि धियो यो नः प्रचोदयात्।
*
*A Day Without Laughter is a day wasted…Keep SmilingJ*
*If u want to leave ur footprints on sand for time, do not drag ur feet.*

REPLY:3
NO
-- 
Regards !

Syed Wasi Haider Rizvi

Chartered Accountant
9634082400, 9528834199

REPLY:4
Dear Sir

Following is the requirement for CARO -2003 :-

*Companies not Covered by the Order*

10. Paragraph 2 of the Order provides that it shall not apply to:

(i) a banking company as defined in clause (c) of section 5 of the Banking
Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949);
(ii) an insurance company as defined in clause (21) of section 2 of the
Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);
(iii) a company licensed to operate under section 25 of the Companies Act,
1956 (1 of 1956);
and
(iv) a private limited company with a paid-up capital and reserves not more
than rupees fifty lakh and which does not have outstanding loan exceeding
rupees twenty five lakhs from any bank or financial institution and does
not have a turnover exceeding rupees five crores at any point of time
during the financial year.

17. Sub-section (32) of section 2 of the Act defines the term “paid-up
capital” as capital credited as paid-up. The Guidance Note on Terms Used in
Financial Statements, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India, defines the term “paid-up share capital” as, “that part of the
subscribed share capital for which consideration in cash or otherwise has
been received. This includes bonus shares allotted by the corporate
enterprise”. Paid-up share capital would include both equity share capital
as well as the preference share capital. While calculating the paid-up
capital, amount of calls unpaid should be deducted from and the amount
originally paid-up on forfeited shares should be added to the figure of
paid-up capital. Share application money received should not be considered
as part of the paid-up capital.

18. The Guidance Note on Terms Used in Financial Statements defines the
term “reserve” as, “The portion of earnings, receipts or other surplus of
an enterprise (whether capital or revenue) appropriated by management for a
general or specific purpose other than provision for depreciation or
diminution in the value of assets or for a known liability. The reserves
are primarily of two types: capital reserves and revenue reserves”. Clause
7(1)(b) of Part III of Schedule VI to the Act also defines the term
“reserve” by way of a negative explanation. According to the said
definition, the expression “reserve” does not include any amount written
off by way of providing for depreciation, renewals or diminution in the
value of assets or retained by way of providing for any known liability.
Thus, a reserve has to be clearly distinguished from a provision.

19. As mentioned in the preceding paragraph, reserves are primarily of two
types–capital reserves and revenue reserves. According to the Guidance Note
on Terms Used in Financial Statements, the term “capital reserve” means “a
reserve of a corporate enterprise which is not
available for distribution as dividend”. The said Guidance Note defines the
term “revenue reserve” as “any reserve other than capital reserve”. For
determining the applicability of the Order to a private limited company,
both capital as well as revenue reserves should be taken into consideration
while computing the limit of rupees fifty lakhs prescribed for paid-up
capital and reserves. Revaluation reserve, if any, should also be taken
into consideration while determining the figure of reserves for the limited
purpose of determining the applicability of the Order. The credit balance
in the profit and loss account should also be considered as a part of
reserve since the balance in the profit and loss account is available for
general purposes like declaration of dividend. The debit balance of the
profit and loss account, if any, should be reduced from the figure of
revenue reserves only. Therefore, if the company does not have revenue
reserves, debit balance of profit and loss account cannot be reduced from
the figures of paid-up capital, capital reserves and revaluation reserves.
For example, if the company has Rs. 40 lakhs of paid up share capital, Rs.
5 lakhs as Revaluation Reserve, Rs. 6 lakhs in Capital Reserve and Rs. 6
lakhs as debit balance in the Profit and Loss Account, the amount of Rs. 6
lakhs standing to the debit of Proft and Loss Account cannot be deducted
from the figures of Rs. 11 lakhs, being the total of the Revaluation
Reserve and the Capital Reserve. However, miscellaneous expenditure to the
extent not written off should not be deducted from the figure of reserves
for the purpose of computing the above limit.

So whatever be the case CARO -2003 will be applicable for your case as your
Reserve and Surplus is exceeding balance.While further breakup of Reserve
and Surplus A/C will help you to clear all your understanding.

Thanking you.

Sumit Agarwal